IMPAKT
Methodology

Editorial standards for decision-grade AI content

IMPAKT uses these standards to keep field notes and frameworks useful without turning an experiment, source, or model output into a claim it cannot support.

Evidence states

Observed, inferred, or unknown

Observed

Directly measured, built, documented, or supported by a named source available for review.

Publication rule: State the workload, configuration, unit, evidence date, and material limitation.

Inferred

A reasoned interpretation built from observations, mechanisms, or comparable evidence.

Publication rule: Label the inference and identify the assumptions connecting evidence to conclusion.

Unknown

A material variable that has not been measured, verified, or supplied.

Publication rule: Keep it visible and state what evidence would reduce the uncertainty.

Measurement and comparison

A result needs its basis

Averages, percentages, and prices are not portable facts. Their meaning depends on the workload and the date.

  1. 01Name the workload and the decision it informs.
  2. 02Define the unit: request, token, second, completed workflow, user, period, or another explicit basis.
  3. 03Match the quality threshold and completion definition across alternatives.
  4. 04Record model, serving configuration, hardware or provider, relevant software, and evidence date.
  5. 05Expose volume, concurrency, input and output shape, repetition, cache behavior, and test duration when material.
  6. 06Include failure paths, retries, fallbacks, human review, and excluded costs.
  7. 07State what the comparison does not prove and where it should not be generalized.
Sources and evidence dates

Prefer inspectable evidence

IMPAKT prefers primary documentation, direct measurements, and sources that expose their method. Time-sensitive claims should carry the date they were checked. Vendor evidence can illustrate a mechanism, but should not be presented as independent proof of buyer outcomes.

Corrections

Change the record clearly

When a material error is confirmed, IMPAKT corrects the canonical page and makes the change visible when it affects the decision. A new price or product behavior is an update; a misstatement of the earlier evidence is a correction.

AI-assisted, human-reviewed

IMPAKT remains responsible for the public claim

AI may help organize, challenge, edit, summarize, or create variants. Public work must still begin with a real question, observation, source, or judgment; be checked for factual and quantitative accuracy; remove confidential details; retain material caveats; and receive human review before publication. Heavy synthetic contribution should be disclosed when it would not otherwise be clear.

Question or correction?

Send the page, claim, and evidence you think changes the analysis. Notes go directly to IMPAKT.

Send